|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 63 post(s) |
Dr Mercy
EC Riders Mech Alliance
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 13:38:00 -
[1] - Quote
Are the new Customs Offices still going to be viewable on the overview? |
Dr Mercy
EC Riders Mech Alliance
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 13:59:00 -
[2] - Quote
Any comments on HP levels? |
Dr Mercy
EC Riders Mech Alliance
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 12:24:00 -
[3] - Quote
I'm wondering why we can't have this:
http://i.imgur.com/SBnBA.png
Rather than the current planned:
http://content.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/2690/2899/Configure.PNG |
Dr Mercy
Doctrine. FEARLESS.
56
|
Posted - 2011.10.20 11:26:00 -
[4] - Quote
Crossposting from the FHC thread on this: http://failheap-challenge.com/showthread.php?4144-DEVBLOG-Player-owned-customs-office
I wrote:
It occurs to me that unless there is an (optional) mechanic to steal ownership of a PCO then the natural preference of lowsec natives to salt the earth (rather than leaving a stable population to 'farm') will practically ensure that individual PI entrepreneurs will not operate anywhere except lowsec backwater islands as the PCOs they are using will be destroyed. Make isk with PI: http://failheap-challenge.com/showthread.php?1207-What-to-do-PI-Processor-only-planets |
Dr Mercy
Doctrine. FEARLESS.
56
|
Posted - 2011.10.20 11:38:00 -
[5] - Quote
And please add a simple corp hanger? I did have 10x the space planned for the corp hanger, but that just makes the personal hanger size obsolete. 35,000m3 for both then, I guess.
http://i.imgur.com/rSdoZ.png becomes http://i.imgur.com/VQAc0.png Make isk with PI: http://failheap-challenge.com/showthread.php?1207-What-to-do-PI-Processor-only-planets |
Dr Mercy
Doctrine. FEARLESS.
56
|
Posted - 2011.10.20 13:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
Isabella Thresher wrote:q1: can we defend our customs office in lowsec without taking a standing hit?
q2: can we use the custom office on a corporate level now, or will it still be single player?
if both answers are NO, then this change will suck....
This is a good point. Does shooting a PCO give an aggression timer to the owning corp? If not then the defenders will have to lose sec status AND go GCC just to engage the attackers. Make isk with PI: http://failheap-challenge.com/showthread.php?1207-What-to-do-PI-Processor-only-planets |
Dr Mercy
Doctrine. FEARLESS.
56
|
Posted - 2011.10.20 14:27:00 -
[7] - Quote
Dr Mercy wrote:Isabella Thresher wrote:q1: can we defend our customs office in lowsec without taking a standing hit?
q2: can we use the custom office on a corporate level now, or will it still be single player?
if both answers are NO, then this change will suck.... This is a good point. Does shooting a PCO give an aggression timer to the owning corp? If not then the defenders will have to lose sec status AND go GCC just to engage the attackers.
I've realised that the agression likely works the same way as attacking a POS. GCC unless you are at war. Make isk with PI: http://failheap-challenge.com/showthread.php?1207-What-to-do-PI-Processor-only-planets |
Dr Mercy
Doctrine. FEARLESS.
56
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 15:28:00 -
[8] - Quote
Phantom, could you add that these structures are deployed by corporations, but do not allow shared corp access (even vials upgrades). Obviously a PCO 'corp hanger' should not be any larger than the normal allowance, but maybe we can have a tickbox ti allow corp member access to our PCOs? Items can only be moved into our own personal hanger from there hangers of others. Make isk with PI: http://failheap-challenge.com/showthread.php?1207-What-to-do-PI-Processor-only-planets |
Dr Mercy
Doctrine. FEARLESS.
56
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 15:32:00 -
[9] - Quote
Probably mentioned already, but rather than magically disappearing the current lowsec, null and WH COs, the just become 'abandoned' or something concord with the tax rate set the the same as the highsec COs. That way, players can remove and replace COs with PCOs as and when they are ready, removing all 'transition period' worries about PI interruption, low availability of gantries, BPOs, etc. Make isk with PI: http://failheap-challenge.com/showthread.php?1207-What-to-do-PI-Processor-only-planets |
Dr Mercy
Doctrine. FEARLESS.
56
|
Posted - 2011.10.22 15:37:00 -
[10] - Quote
Dr Mercy wrote:Probably mentioned already, but rather than magically disappearing the current lowsec, null and WH COs, the just become 'abandoned' or something concord with the tax rate set the the same as the highsec COs. That way, players can remove and replace COs with PCOs as and when they are ready, removing all 'transition period' worries about PI interruption, low availability of gantries, BPOs, etc.
Sorry for the triple post, but why not use the above method for highsec PCOs too? Just set a mandated 'concord minimum' the tax to ensure the encouragement to use lowsec rather than highsec? Along with no capacity to exclude reds, or neutrals, etc. Make isk with PI: http://failheap-challenge.com/showthread.php?1207-What-to-do-PI-Processor-only-planets |
|
|
|
|